Abstract
Virtual networks have been created as a space that has acted as an accelerator of many rebellions in all parts of the world at the beginning of the third millennium, and as imperceptible floating networks, it is the source of potential and actual conflicts, riots and social unrest that is Janus-like. Action and can cause rise, development and relaxation at the same time. The social space contains a simultaneous multiplicity of spaces that intersect each other, have an internal relationship with each other, are aligned or placed in contradictions and contradictions, so the permitted space causes the rise of subjects and challenges the structures. has done Therefore, the current research aims to answer this basic question: were the virtual space and its tools effective in the formation and spread of social unrest in November 2018? The hypothesis of the research states that virtual space has an effect on the formation and spread of social unrest, and this influence or reliance on Ted Robert's theory of relative deprivation has been analyzed. Also, the present research is practical and using a qualitative method with the help of Taking library and field tools (especially interviews with a number of elites) has been used to analyze the data.
Keywords: social unrest, riot, social network, developments of 2018.
 
Introduction
Anwar Mostafavi et al.(1401) in an article entitled collective behavior or protest action: the study of social unrest in November 2018, using the basic theory, emphasizes the importance of social unrest to public dissatisfaction and unconventional methods and sometimes violence. It refers to the relationship of people in society. In this article, the social unrest of November 1998 is investigated. The lack of general consensus on the application of concepts, as well as the lack of theoretical consensus in examining these unrests, shows the problematic aspects of this issue. This research was conducted with the aim of investigating the nature of the social unrest in November 2018 using a qualitative method.
Virtual Protests and Civil Society, Internet and Social Movements by "theron van lear" in 2015. In this article, whose theoretical basis is the theory of social movements and mobilization, the researcher depicts the typology of digital protest actions and Internet-based support for virtual protests.
Theoretical framework: Ted Robert Gere's relative deprivation
Relative deprivation theory has been widely used in social psychology, sociology and other social sciences for more than a century. This popularity shows its usefulness to explain many contradictions and controversies. Ted Roberger's theory is one of these theories that follows Davis's rising expectations theory. James Davis is one of the Western theorists who believes in the theory of economy and economic factors as the cause of revolution. In the meantime
Garr begins his theory based on the seemingly self-evident premise that dissatisfaction is the root cause of violent conflict. In other words, according to Gar, relative deprivation is the negative difference between legitimate expectations and the reality of this supposed dissatisfaction to commit violent acts, it is the result of creating relative deprivation in people, and according to Gar, relative deprivation is: "perceived difference" Between the value expectations of people, the means and conditions of life that people believe are truly their right, and the value ability of the means and conditions that they think they have the ability to acquire and maintain.
 
Materials & Methods
Since this article seeks to identify the sociological dimensions of social unrest in November 2018 with the activism of social networks, this article can be considered practical. In terms of the purpose of this article, it is in the category of exploratory research, and in this article, the method of theme analysis and interpretive paradigm is used and the qualitative approach is taken into consideration. In order to carry out the article, first the records of previous researches were studied in order to get an understanding of the current situation. In these studies, the existing models and frameworks were examined. Then, through interviews with 9 experts and experts in this field, based on theoretical sampling and through several stages, their opinions on the sociological dimensions of social unrest with network activism were selected. In order to collect data, an interview protocol with an open-ended questionnaire was designed in which relevant questions were asked to the participants and the desired data was collected.
 
Discussion & Result
Qualitative data analysis in this article includes interviews conducted with informants, which ultimately leads the researcher to a structured and systematic model. In this way, the data obtained from the process of semi-standard interviews with experts, after extraction, were compiled in the form of news reports and in order to achieve comprehensive themes (main categories), first the process of theoretical coding in three stages of open coding (discovery) basic themes), central coding (discovery of organized themes) and selective coding (discovery of overarching themes) have been used. In the following, the data obtained from the interviews with experts have been analyzed. According to the results of the research data analysis, it can be said that the November 2018 rebellion in Iran is definitely rooted in the 2016 rebellion and its consequences. Thus, the protests of November 2018 were completely different from the Green Movement in 2018, because its main demand was justice and economic equality, and its class base was also the middle to lower classes and the economic inferiors. The lack of economy of smell, and the beginning of the movement from "surroundings" to "center" or "margins to the center". As the information showed, most of the protests started from the outskirts of the cities. What is certain is that according to the population statistics, the marginal population in the cities of Islamshahr, Quds, Shahryar and Mallard as the main centers of the rebellion was equal to 548,316, 377 and 744 thousand respectively. Economic marginalization, which of course occurred from the beginning of Hassan Rouhani's second administration and with the dollar's appreciation, had not only an economic dimension, but also social and political dimensions. Therefore, many people found themselves marginalized in the three economic, social and political fields. In short, the existing dissatisfactions, which were more or less reflected in the rebellious actions of the people, can be divided into the problems of poverty, misery, class gap in the society and economic corruption. But this rebellion, as mentioned, cannot be analyzed with a well-known theoretical basis such as the prevailing and dominant theories on the sociology of rebellion, such as social movements, mobilization of resources, etc., because this rebellion has characteristics such as sudden rise, subsidence. The sudden, nationwide and sudden inclusion of Iran, very sudden radicalization and very sudden carriers made the components of sociological theories of action not burden on this rebellion. Although according to the theory of some thinkers, the above components and specifically the lack of a leader can make social norms fragile, unstable and contradictory, but as mentioned, the cases of Aban 1998 are under rebellion and not social movement. As it was mentioned, but the important component in the cases of Aban 1998, the impact of the Internet and virtual networks on civil conflict, was an undeniable necessity, because in this highly inflammatory environment, virtual networks, due to the extremely diverse and fragmented environment, It has provided for chaos, conflict and conflict.
 
Conclusion
The November 2018 rebellion cannot be analyzed with a well-known theoretical basis such as the prevailing and dominant theories on the sociology of rebellion such as social movements, mobilization of resources, etc., because this rebellion has characteristics such as sudden rise, sudden subsidence, The sudden inclusion of Iran and the whole country, the sudden radicalization, etc. made the elements of social movement theories not apply to this rebellion. Because, as mentioned, the November 1998 cases are under rebellion and not social movement. In these unrests, the impact of social networks has been seen effectively, considering that the virtual space is a created and confused space that acts as a catalyst for many riots in different countries at the beginning of the third millennium, and due to the space The multiple and disjointed end leads to chaos, conflict and contradiction because this space is completely centripetal and borderless.