نوع مقاله : علمی ـ پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 کارشناسی ارشد گروه فلسفه علم دانشگاه صنعتی شریف
2 استاد گروه فلسفة علم، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف
چکیده
بیش از دو دهه است که روانشناسان و جامعه‌شناسان درباره آسیب‌های رسانه‌های نوین اجتماعی هشدار می‌دهند. در دهه اخیر، تحقیقات عصب‌شناختی نیز به کمک این حوزه آمده است تا بنیادی تجربی برای این مدعا فراهم آورد. (زمینه پژوهش). در این مطالعه‌ی توصیفی، قصد داریم ابعاد عصب‌شناختی آسیب‌های رسانه‌های اجتماعی را واکاوی کنیم (روش کار). سه بخش مغز یعنی «شبکه شناخت اجتماعی»، «شبکه شناخت خود مرجع» و «شبکه پاداش»، در گرایش افراد به رسانه‌های اجتماعی نقش اساسی دارند. مکانیسم‌های پاداش که در رسانه‌ها تعریف شده است و تغییرات عصب‌شناختی مغز در دوران نوجوانی، سبب فعالیت بیشتر این سه منطقه می‌شود و یک تقویت کننده مهم در استفاده روز افزون از رسانه‌های اجتماعی است. از سویی، تنهایی، افسردگی و ضعف حافظه از مهم‌ترین آسیب‌های رسانه‌های اجتماعی است که ریشه آن علاوه بر تغییرات عصب‌شناختی مغز در دوره نوجوانی، به تأثیر همسالان و چندوظیفه‌ای بودن رسانه‌های اجتماعی نیز باز می‌گردد (یافته‌ها). در این مقاله پس از بررسی عصب‌شناختی برخی از مهم‌ترین آسیب‌های رسانه‌های اجتماعی، به این پرسش پاسخ می‌دهیم که آیا پژوهش‌های عصب‌شناختی از آسیب‌های رسانه‌های اجتماعی حمایت می‌کنند یا خیر؟ در انتها یادآور می‌شویم که این تحقیق‌ها با محدودیت‌هایی نیز همراه است اما اعتبار نتایج پژوهش‌های این حوزه را مخدوش نمی‌سازد (نتیجه‌گیری).
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
A neurological analysis of new social media injuries
نویسندگان [English]
- Somayeh Rasouli 1
- Seyyed Hassan Hosseini 2
1 Department of Philosophy of Science, Sharif University of Technology
2 Professor in Philosophy of Science, Sharif Industrial University
چکیده [English]
For more than two decades psychologists and sociologists have been warning about the damages of new social media. In the last decade, neurological research has been developed to provide an empirical foundation to support the above hypothesis. Researchers hold that a significant contribution to the adolescent trend plays a significant role in the tendency of individuals toward social media. The three parts of the brain, namely the "social cognition network," the "self-referential cognition network" and the "reward network", are worth mentioning of individuals to social media. The reward mechanisms that have been defined in the media and the neurological changes of the brain during adolescence, cause more stimulation and activity in the three regions. On the other hand, loneliness, depression, and memory weakness are one of the most important injuries of social media in addition to the changes of the brain in adolescence, it also goes back to the influence of peers and the media multitasker. In this paper, after examining the neuroscience of some of the most important harms of social media and its roots, we show that this research is accompanied by limitations, but these limitations do not undermine the validity of the results of the research field.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- new social media
- social cognition network
- self-referential cognition network
- reward network
- synapse pruning
- memory
- Albert, D., & Chein, J., & Steinberg, L; 2013, “The Teenage Brain: Peer Influences on Adolescent Decision Making”, Psychological Science, SAGE.
- Bell, V; 2009, “The Myth of the Concentration Oasis”, https://mindhacks.com/2009/02/11/the-myth-of-the-concentration-oasis/
- Bertot, J. C., & Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M; 2010, “Using ICTs to Create a Culture of Transparency:E-government and Social Media as Openness and Anti-corruption Tools for Societies”, Elsevier.
- Carr, N; 2010, “The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains”, New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
- Cheng, J., Burke, M., Davis, E, G; 2019, “Understanding Perceptions of Problematic Facebook Use”, Glasgow, Scotland UK, ACM, ISBN.
- Choudhury, S., & McKinney, K. A; 2013, “Digital media, the developing brain and the interpretive plasticity of neuroplasticity”, journals Permissions.
- Crone, E, A., & Konijn, E, A; 2018, “Media use and brain development during adolescence”, Nature Communication.
- Devezer, B., & Nardin, L, G., & Baumgaertner, B., & Buzbas, E, O; 2019, “Scientific discovery in a model-centric framework: Reproducibility, innovation, and epistemic diversity”, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216125
- Firth, J., & Torous, J., & Stubbs, B., & Firth, J, A., & Steiner, G, Z., & Smith, L., &, Alvarez-Jimenez, M; 2019, “The online brain: how the Internet may be changing our cognition”, World Psychiatry.
- Gardner, M., & Steinberg, L; 2005, “Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study”, Developmental Psychology.
- Grabowski, M; 2015, “Neuroscience and Media”, Jennifer, T., Sneider and Marisa, M., Silveri, “Neurobiology of Teen Brain Development and the Digital Age”, Routledge, New York.
- Haferkamp, N., & Kramer, N, C; 2011, “Social comparison 2.0: Examining the effects of online profiles on Social-networking sites”, Cyberpsychol, Behav, Soc. Netw.
- Kandel, E, R; 2006, “In Search of Memory: The Emergence of a New Science of mind”, New York, Norton.
- Kessler, R. C., & Birnbaum, H. G., & Shahly, V., & Bromet, E., & Hwang, I., & McLaughlin, K. A., & Stein, D. J; 2010, “Age differences in the prevalence and co-morbidity of DSM-IV major depressive episodes”, Results from the WHO world mental health survey initiative. Depression and Anxiety, 27(4), 351e364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/da.20634
- Kim, J., & LaRose, R., & Peng, W; 2009, “Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic Internet use: the relationship between Internet use and psychological well-being”, Cyber Psychology & Behavior. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0327.Lee, H., Han, Y., Kim, K. K., & Kim, Y. (2014). Sports and social media: Twitter usage patterns during the 2013 super bowl broadcast. In Proceedings from International Conference on Communication, Media, Technology and Design.
- Levinson, P; 2009, “ New new Media”, Boston.
- Lin, K., & Lu, H; 2011, “Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory”, Computer in Human Behavior.
- Mathers, C. D., & Loncar, D; 2006, “Projections of global mortality and burden of disease”, from 2002 to 2030.PLoS Medicine, 3(11), e442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442
- Meshi,D., & Tamir, D, I., & Heekeren, H, R; 2015, "The emerging neuroscience of social media", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Elsevier.
- Merzenich, M; 2008, “Going Googly”, on the brain blog, August 11. http://Merzenich.positscience/?p=177
- Mills, K, L., & Lalonde, F., & Clasen, L, S., & Giedd, J, N., & Blakemore, S., J; 2014, “Developmental changes in the structure of the social brain in late childhood and adolescence” Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci.
- Moody, E. J; 2001, “Internet use and its relationship to loneliness”, Cyber Psychology & Behavior.
- McLuhan, M; 2003, “understanding media: the extensions of man”, critical ed., ed. W Terrence Gordon (Corte Madera, CA: Gingko).
- Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S,G; 2012, “Why do people use Facebook?”, Pers, Individ, Dif,52.
- Nieuwenhuys, R; 2008, “The Human Central Nervous System”, Springer.
- Olsen, S ; 2005, “Are We Getting Smarter or Dumber?”, CNET NEWs, September 21. http://news.cnet.com/Are-we-getting-smarter-or-dumber/2008-1008_3-5875404.html
- Primack, B, A., Shensa, A., Escobar-Viera, C, G., Barrett, E, L., Sidani, J, E., Colditz, J, B., James, A, E; 2017, “Use of multiple social media Platforms and symptoms of depression and anxiety: A nationally-representative study among U.S young adults”, Computer in Human Behavior, Elsevier.
- Pittman, M., & Reich, B; 2016, “Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram Picture may be Worth more than a thousand Twitter Words", Computer in Human Behavior, Elsevier.
- Riva, G., & Wiederhold, B.K., & Cipresso, P; 2016, “Psychology of social media: From technology to identity”, Psychology of Social Networking: Warsaw, Poland.
- Roberts, M; 1987, “Atlas of the Human Brain in Section”, Lea & Febiger.
- Shaw, L. H., & Gant, L. M; 2002, “In defense of the Internet: the relationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support”, Cyber Psychology & Behavior. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/109493102753770552.Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976).The social psychology of telecommunications. New York, NY: John Wiley & Son.
- Sherman, L, E., & Hernandez, L, M., & Greenfield, P, M., & Dapretto, M; 2018, " What the brain ‘Likes’: neural correlates of providing feedback on social media ", Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Oxford.
- Sherman, L, E., & Payton, A, A., & Hernandez, L, M., & Greenfield, P, M., & Dapretto, M; 2016, “The Power of the Like in Adolescence: Effects of Peer Influence on Neural and Behavioral Responses to Social Media”, Psychological Science.
- Somerville, L, H; 2013, “The Teenage Brain: Sensitivity to Social Evaluation”, Psychological Science, SAGE.
- Sunder, S, S; 2008, "Main model: a heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility", Cambridge, MA: the MIT Press.
- Tamnes, C. K; 2017, “Development of the cerebral cortex across adolescence” a multisample study of inter-related longitudinal changes in cortical volume, surface area, and thickness.
- Ward, A,F; 2013, “Supernormal: how the Internet is changing our memories and our minds”, Psychol Inq.
- Wegner, D, M., & Ward, A, F; 2013, “The internet has become the external hard drive for our memories”, Sci Am.
- Worland, J; 2015, "Why loneliness may be the next big publish-health issue", Time magazine, Rerieved on july 3, from http://time.com/3747784/loneliness-mortality/.
)