Abstract
Religious authority in Islam—particularly within the Shi‘a tradition—has long played a central role in guiding the religious, legal, and social life of Muslim communities. However, with the intensification of globalization—especially in its cultural, communicative, and epistemological dimensions—the traditional structure of religious authority has encountered significant challenges. These transformations, influenced by the spread of communication technologies, the rise of epistemic individualism, the acceleration of information flows, and the expansion of interpretive horizons, have prompted a critical reassessment of authority within Islamic philosophical and theological discourse. This study focuses on the evolving nature of religious authority under globalization, asking how globalizing processes have reshaped the legitimacy, function, and influence of religious scholars within Islamic theological systems. The central hypothesis posits that globalization, by introducing a gap between classical religious structures and the contemporary landscape of religious knowledge, has not only disrupted the traditional patterns of ijtihad and religious education but has also facilitated the emergence of new religious actors and a reconfiguration of religious legitimacy. The research employs a qualitative content analysis methodology. The statistical population includes scholarly sources addressing Islamic theology, philosophy of religion, and the impacts of globalization, while the purposive sample consists of 15 rigorously selected academic books and articles. Findings suggest that Shi‘a religious authority today oscillates between resistance and adaptation to the dynamics of globalization: while some scholars strategically utilize new platforms and global discourses to reassert their influence, others remain committed to classical modes of religious authority and theological legitimacy.
 
Keywords: Religious authority, Islamic theology, philosophy of religion, globalization, ijtihad, religious legitimacy, theological challenges
 
 
Introduction
Religious authority has been one of the central institutions in Islamic theology, particularly within the Shi'a tradition, where it extends beyond legal rulings to encompass spiritual, educational, and socio-political guidance. In recent decades, processes of globalization—through the spread of information technologies, cultural interconnectedness, and epistemic pluralism—have profoundly reshaped the conditions under which religious authority functions. While traditional religious authority was largely localized, hierarchical, and mediated through recognized scholarly structures, the global context has introduced new networks, discourses, and audiences that often bypass classical systems of validation and transmission. The research problem addressed in this study concerns the extent to which philosophical and theological challenges have impacted the traditional structure of religious authority in Islam under the forces of globalization. In particular, it interrogates the case of Shi'a religious authority, exploring whether classical theological justifications for the authority of fuqaha remain intact in a context where digital communication, democratized knowledge, and the erosion of epistemic boundaries challenge hierarchical religious structures.The study is grounded in the hypothesis that globalization has not only altered the mechanisms of knowledge production and dissemination but has also triggered a theological and philosophical crisis regarding the very nature of religious legitimacy, interpretation, and the authority to speak in the name of Islam.
 
Methods and Materials
This study is qualitative in nature, employing a content analysis methodology with an interpretive approach. The selection of sources was based on purposive sampling criteria, focusing on works that engage directly with the intersection of Islamic theology, religious authority, and the sociocultural transformations induced by globalization. The research sample includes 18 scholarly sources—books, peer-reviewed articles, and doctoral dissertations—spanning Persian and English-language academic literature. Notable among these are works by Mohiuddin (2023), Whyte (2024), Takim (2007), and Mavani (2013) in English, and key Iranian scholars such as Kadivar, Firoozi, and Vaezi.
In terms of thematic structure, the data were organized into conceptual clusters including:
The theological foundations of religious authority
The mechanisms of legitimacy in classical Shi’a thought
The impact of global epistemological shifts
The transformation of clerical roles in transnational contexts
Each text was examined for its conceptual contribution to the understanding of religious authority, the challenges posed by modern conditions, and the proposed responses by scholars and institutions.
 
Results and Discussion
The findings of the study reveal that globalization has challenged the authority of traditional maraji‘ (religious authorities) on multiple fronts. From a philosophical perspective, the universality and stability of truth claims—once rooted in metaphysical certainties and interpretive traditions—have come under pressure due to the relativistic and pluralistic tendencies of global discourse. This has led to a re-evaluation of concepts such as ijtihad, taqlid, and marja‘iyyah in Shi’a thought.. The study highlights several key developments:
Erosion of monopoly in interpretation: The digital and global information environment has enabled a proliferation of voices claiming religious legitimacy, thereby undermining the exclusive interpretive authority of traditional scholars (Whyte, 2024; Ali, 2010).
Emergence of alternative authorities: Religious influencers, online educators, and hybrid figures who blend secular and religious training now compete with classical scholars for legitimacy and public trust (Mohiuddin, 2023; Zaid et al., 2022).
Shift in epistemological expectations: The new generation of Muslims—especially in urban, educated environments—demand transparent, dialogical, and rational forms of theological discourse. They are less willing to accept hierarchical authority that is not accountable or accessible (Jaya, 2024).
Dual reaction of traditional authority: While some scholars have adapted by engaging with global platforms and reinterpreting traditional teachings for contemporary audiences (e.g., producing social media content, publishing in international forums), others have resisted the perceived dilution of authority and remained rooted in conventional modes of transmission (Vaezi, 2004; Bunt, 2018).
These dynamics have profound implications not only for the transmission of Islamic knowledge but also for the nature of theological discourse itself. Questions of divine sovereignty, prophetic succession, and human agency—long-standing themes in kalam—are now being revisited in light of these shifting structures of authority.
 
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that the phenomenon of globalization has triggered a multidimensional transformation in the domain of Islamic religious authority, particularly in Shi’a thought. These transformations are not merely sociological but deeply philosophical and theological. The traditional concept of religious authority—anchored in the structures of ijtihad, marja‘iyyah, and communal consensus—faces both internal and external challenges. The results suggest that religious authority is no longer a fixed institution but a dynamic field shaped by negotiation, contestation, and adaptation. The future of religious leadership in Islam will depend on its ability to engage with global realities while remaining faithful to theological integrity. For this, a renewed dialogue between classical kalam and contemporary philosophy of religion is not only beneficial but necessary.