Document Type : .

Authors

1 University of Tehran

2 Islamic Azad University, Center Tehran Branch

Abstract

This research sheds light on networked publics’ activism on Persian Twitter. Networked publics is a phenomena to understand dynamics and practices of social media users. Based on this concept and networked framing theory, we investigated tweet types, tweet tones and the ways of framing characters (and tweet orientation toward them) by networked publics on Persian Twitter during Iran 2017 presidential election. We combined social network analysis, ethnographic content analysis and social media critical discourse study approach. First, we collected 2596284 tweets during the election period. Then, we focused on retweet (RT) network as the information diffusion network, and discovered networked publics by applying cluster analysis on this corpus. Afterwards, we identified 50 top influential users in each cluster based on their PageRanks. Finally, we collected all tweets of these users in the whole network and analyzed them. We used 3 coders to code the selected sample of 10416 tweets in 3 rounds. Results showed that commentary, quotation and news are the most frequent tweet types. Furthermore, Iranian users mostly tweeted using serious and sarcastic tones. Finally, our finding showed that Rouhani was the first name in framed characters.

Keywords

Altheide, D. L., & Scheneider, C. J. (2013). Qualitative Media Analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Ansari, A. (2012) The role of social media in Iran’s Green Movement (2009- 2012), Global Media Journal (Australian Edition). 6 (2).
Barnard, S. R. (2016). “Tweet or be sacked”: Twitter and the new elements of journalistic practice. Journalism, 17(2), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884914553079
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
Boyd, D. (2011). Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In Papacharrissi, Z. (EDs) Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, pp. 39-58.
Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, Crowds, and Markets: A Book by David Easley and Jon Kleinberg. In Book. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761942
Ems, L. (2014). Twitter’s place in the tussle: how old power struggles play out on a new stage. Media, Culture & Society, 36(5), 720–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443714529070
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London and New York: E. Arnold.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Hermida, A. (2010). TWITTERING THE NEWS: The emergence of ambient journalism. Journalism Practice, 4(3), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512781003640703
Himelboim, I., Sweetser, K. D., Tinkham, S. F., Cameron, K., Danelo, M., & West, K. (2014). Valence-based homophily on Twitter: Network Analysis of Emotions and Political Talk in the 2012 Presidential Election. New Media & Society, 1461444814555096-. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814555096
Hooshmand, K. (2015, July). “Soft Power” and its manifestations in international diplomacy. CGCS Media Wire. Retrieved from: http://www.global.asc.upenn.edu/soft-power-and-its-manifestations-in-international-diplomacy/
Hopke, J. E. (2015). Hashtagging Politics : Transnational Anti-Fracking Movement Twitter Practices. Social Media + Society, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115605521
Kadushin, C. (2002). Introduction to Social Network Theory. Networks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2254-9
Khazraee, E. (2019). Mapping the political landscape of Persian Twitter: The case of 2013 presidential election. Big Data & Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719835232
KhosraviNik, M. (2017). Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS). In J. Flowerdew & J. Richardson (Eds.), Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 582–596). London: Routledge.
Marchant, J., Ormson, T., Honari, A., & Sabeti, A. (2018). #iranvotes2017: Analysing the 2017 iranian presidential elections through Telegram, Twitter and Instagram. London.
Marchant, J., Sabeti, A., Bowen, K., & Kelly, J. (2016). # IranVotes: Political Discourse on Iranian Twitter during the 2016 Parliamentary Elections. Retrieved from https://smallmedia.org.uk/work/iranvotes
Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 138–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212474472
Moghanizadeh, S. (2013). The role of social media in Iran’s Green Movement. University of Gothenburg. Retrieved from https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/34206/1/gupea_2077_34206_1.pdf
Papacharissi, Z. (2014). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Sadler, N. (2018). Narrative and interpretation on Twitter: Reading tweets by telling stories. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3266–3282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817745018
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: SAGE.
Skocpol, T. (2003). Diminished democracy. From membership to management in American civic life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Spiegelberg, H. (1991). The Phenomenological Movement. Dordrecht, The Netherlands.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. London, England: Continuum International Publishing Group.