Interdisciplinary Studies in Media and Culture

The Role of News Media in Reconstructing Political Discourses in the Middle East with an Emphasis on Iran’s Geopolitics (2011–2025)

Document Type : .

Author

Sajjad Kamari

Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Turan Non-Governmental Higher Education Institute, Damghan, Semnan, Iran

10.30465/ismc.2025.51753.2954
Abstract
Abstract
This study examines the role of culture and media in the reconstruction of political discourses in the Middle East, with a particular focus on the geopolitics of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The central question of the research is how regional powers—especially Iran—utilize cultural and media tools to represent themselves and undermine rival discourses. The core inquiry is: how do culture and media contribute to the construction, reinforcement, or transformation of political discourses in the Middle East, and how has Iran employed these capacities to enhance its regional position? The hypothesis of the study is that Iran, through cultural-identity components and strategic use of aligned media outlets, has reproduced a specific discourse centered on resistance, independence, and justice—functioning as a means of soft power projection in the region. Adopting an interpretive approach, this qualitative research employs thematic discourse analysis to examine the content of 30 selected media outlets (15 aligned with Iran and 15 opposing or neutral), including networks such as Press TV, Al-Alam, Al-Arabiya, Al-Jazeera, BBC, and Sky News, over the period 2011 to 2025. The findings indicate that media outlets, beyond merely reflecting political realities, play an active role in producing and stabilizing identity-based narratives. The geopolitical competition between Iran and its regional rivals is largely framed within the field of cultural and media-based narrative construction.
Keywords: Culture, Media, Political Discourse, Cultural Geopolitics, Iran, Discourse Analysis, Middle East
Introduction
The institution of religious authority (marja‘iyyah) has long held a central place in Islamic theological, legal, and social life—particularly within the Shi'a tradition. In this tradition, religious authority extends beyond the issuance of legal rulings to encompass spiritual guidance, interpretation of divine law, and the preservation of doctrinal integrity. However, the processes of globalization—characterized by rapid technological development, expanded communication networks, epistemic pluralism, and the erosion of traditional knowledge hierarchies—have posed significant challenges to this long-standing institution. In contemporary Islamic societies, particularly those navigating both traditional religious structures and modern global pressures, the concept and function of religious authority are undergoing fundamental transformation. The present study investigates the philosophical and theological challenges confronting religious authority in the context of globalization, with a special focus on Shi’a Islamic thought. It asks: how has globalization influenced the legitimacy, role, and perceived authority of traditional fuqaha? Furthermore, to what extent are these changes symptomatic of a broader theological shift, rather than merely sociological developments?

Methods and Materials
This research adopts a qualitative approach, specifically employing content analysis of a purposive sample of academic texts. The methodology is interpretive, grounded in thematic analysis of both primary and secondary literature on Islamic theology, religious authority, philosophy of religion, and the sociocultural effects of globalization. The statistical population includes all relevant scholarly works addressing the relationship between religious legitimacy and contemporary global dynamics. The sample consists of 18 books and peer-reviewed articles—a mixture of Persian and English sources—selected for their direct relevance to the research question and their academic credibility. These sources include works by Takim (2007), Mavani (2013), Mohiuddin (2023), Whyte (2024), and Kadivar (2003), as well as Persian scholars such as Firoozi, Vaezi, and Ma‘aref. Each text was analyzed for content relating to:

1. The theological foundations of marja‘iyyah in Shi'a thought
2. Epistemological transformations under globalization
3. Emergent challenges to traditional religious authority
4. The adaptation (or resistance) of religious actors to global change
5.
Themes were identified through iterative reading, and key conceptual tensions—between tradition and modernity, hierarchy and plurality, authority and autonomy—were mapped across the sources.

Discussion &Results
The research findings indicate that globalization has led to both disruption and redefinition of religious authority in Islamic contexts. Several key dynamics were identified:
-Epistemological Displacement: The study finds that traditional structures of religious authority are increasingly challenged by a new epistemic environment in which knowledge is democratized, decentralized, and subject to public contestation. Religious scholars are no longer the sole interpreters of divine texts; rather, laypeople increasingly participate in online theological debates, often guided by algorithmic amplification rather than scholarly lineage (Bunt, 2018; Ali, 2010).
-The Emergence of Alternative Authorities: Figures with no formal training in classical Islamic sciences—social media influencers, activist imams, or hybrid intellectuals—are gaining religious credibility among younger audiences. This undermines the exclusivity of traditional maraji‘ and fosters competition in defining religious norms (Zaid et al., 2022; Mohiuddin, 2023).
-Generational Shifts in Religious Expectation: Younger Muslims, particularly those raised in urban and globalized contexts, are less inclined to accept authority without dialogical engagement and transparency. The study highlights a growing demand for reasoned, ethical, and accessible theological discourse, challenging traditional modes of jurisprudential instruction and taqlid (Whyte, 2024; Firoozi, 2011).
-Dual Responses from Traditional Authority: Some maraji‘ have embraced technological tools, online platforms, and accessible language to maintain relevance and assert their authority in a global context. Others have resisted adaptation, fearing erosion of scholarly integrity and the collapse of doctrinal hierarchy (Vaezi, 2004; Soroush Mahallati, 2009).
-Theological Reinterpretation of Legitimacy: The concept of legitimacy itself—rooted in Quranic verses, the Imamate, and rational foundations—has undergone reassessment. The study argues that theological discourse is no longer confined to classical kalam texts but now includes broader philosophical and sociopolitical questions related to representation, moral autonomy, and religious authenticity.
Overall, the research shows that while globalization presents undeniable challenges to religious authority, it also opens pathways for the revitalization of theological thought. By engaging critically with global discourses, Islamic scholars have the opportunity to articulate a renewed vision of marja‘iyyah that balances fidelity to tradition with responsiveness to contemporary realities.

Conclusion
This study concludes that religious authority in Shi’a Islam is currently at a philosophical and theological crossroads. Globalization has created an epistemic and institutional rupture that forces traditional religious institutions to reassess both their mode of operation and their foundational legitimacy. Far from signaling a collapse of authority, this moment offers an opportunity for creative theological engagement. If Islamic religious thought is to remain a living and effective guide for Muslim societies, its institutions must not only preserve doctrinal integrity but also adopt flexible, inclusive, and dialogical approaches to authority. The ongoing challenge will be to formulate a concept of marja‘iyyah that withstands the fragmentation of modern epistemologies while offering meaningful spiritual and ethical leadership in an interconnected world.

Keywords

Culture
Media
Geopolitics
Iran
Discourse
Middle East
ترابی‌اقدم، م.، و بختیاری، ت. (۱۴۰۱). محور مقاومت اسلامی در گفتمان شبکه‌های خبری یورونیوز، بی‌بی‌سی و العالم. پژوهشنامه رسانه بین‌الملل، ۷(۲)، ۱۲۹–۱۶۴.
باویر، ح. (۱۴۰۰). ژئوپلیتیک رسانه ملی و نقش آن در همگرایی شیعیان خاورمیانه. فصلنامه علمی مطالعات خاورمیانه، ۲۸(۳)، ۱۰۵–۱۲۸.
شمسایی‌نیا، ر. (۱۴۰۲). راهبردهای تصویرسازی رسانه‌ای از جنبش‌های مقاومت در جهان اسلام؛ موردپژوهی حشدالشعبی عراق. فصلنامه بیداری اسلامی، ۱۲(۱)، ۸۱–۱۰۹.
Akdoğan, İ., Küpeli, M. Ş., & Gürler, R. T. (2022). The construction of strategic narrative in the Saudi-Iranian regional rivalry: The case of the Yemeni civil war. İnsan ve Toplum, 12(2), 59-110.
Al-Ghazzi, O., & Kraidy, M. M. (2013). Neo-Ottoman cool 2: Turkish nation branding and Arabic-language transnational broadcasting. International Journal of Communication, 7, 2341–2360.
Byman, D. (2012). Iran’s support for terrorism in the Middle East. Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/irans-support-for-terrorism-in-the-middle-east
Chaziza, M. (2016). Iranian soft power and Syria. Middle East Review of International Affairs, 20(2), 1–9.
Farzam, A., Moradi, P., Mohammadi, S., Padar, Z., & Siegel, A. A. (2023). Opinion manipulation on farsi twitter. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 333.
Fraihat, I. (2020). Iran and Saudi Arabia: Taming a Chaotic Conflict. Edinburgh University Press.
Hunter, S. T. (2010). Iran's foreign policy in the post-Soviet era: Resisting the new international order. Praeger.
Kozhanov, N. (2016). Iran’s strategic thinking: The evolution of its soft power and regional policies. Carnegie Moscow Center. Retrieved from https://carnegie.ru/commentary/64897
Mabon, S. (2023). The struggle for supremacy in the Middle East. Cambridge University Press.
Mohammad, T. (2022). Iranian-Saudi Rivalry Since 1979: In the Words of Kings and Clerics. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs.
Nye, J. S. (2008). Public diplomacy and soft power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94–109.
Özyakar, A. F. (2025). The evolution and ramifications of the Iran-Saudi rivalry through multiple lenses: A review of Mabon, Fraihat, and Mohammad. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 20(1), 1–9.
Pechenina, A. (2024). Politics of representations in the media and intercultural understanding: A critical theory perspective (Master’s thesis, University for Foreigners of Perugia). Supervised by Prof. Mauro Farnesi Camellone.
Wehrey, F. (2013). Sectarian politics in the Gulf: From the Iraq War to the Arab Uprisings. Columbia University Press.
Al Jazeera. (2017, October 18). Iran’s role in fight against IS in Syria and Iraq. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/10/18/irans-role-in-fight-against-is-in-syria-and-iraq
Al Jazeera. (2018, May 9). World leaders react to US withdrawal from Iranian nuclear deal. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/5/9/world-leaders-react-to-us-withdrawal-from-iranian-nuclear-deal
Sadjadpour, K. (2020, March 12). The evolution of Arab popular opinion toward Iran, and Iranian self-perceptions. Hoover Institution. Retrieved from https://www.hoover.org/research/evolution-arab-popular-opinion-toward-iran-and-iranian-self-perceptions
Schliebitz, S. (2011). Shaping Perceptions: The Role of the Media in Iran's Foreign Policy. German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP). https://www.cfc.forces.gc.ca/259/290/297/286/schliebitz.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
CNN. (2018, May 8). World leaders react to Trump’s decision on Iran nuclear deal. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/08/europe/iran-deal-world-leaders-react/index.html
Congressional Research Service. (2018, December 6). Iran’s Foreign and Defense Policies. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/115/crs-reports/R44017.pdf
Press TV. (2017, August 10). Iran-led Resistance front defeats Daesh terrorists in Syria. Retrieved from https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2017/08/10/531151/Iran-Daesh-Syria-Resistance-PressTV
 Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies. (2023). Iran and the Arab Revolutions: Positions and Repercussions. Retrieved from https://www.dohainstitute.org/en/lists/ACRPS-PDFDocumentLibrary/Iran_and_the_Arab_Revolutions_Positions_and_Repercussions.pdf
Gulf Centre for Human Rights. (2012). Bahrain attacks Iran over mistranslating Morsi's speech on Syria. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/iran-blog/2012/sep/03/bahrain-iran-mistranslating-morsi-syria-speech
Jamestown Foundation. (2011). Special Commentary: Iranian Reaction to the Great Syrian Revolt. Retrieved from https://jamestown.org/program/special-commentary-iranian-reaction-to-the-great-syrian-revolt/
Al Jazeera. (2011, August 30). Bahrain's contribution to the Arab Spring. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2011/8/30/bahrains-contribution-to-the-arab-spring
IEMed. (2020). Turkish soap operas: Soft power at the service of a rising power’s political ambitions. European Institute of the Mediterranean. Retrieved from https://www.iemed.org/publication/turkish-soap-operas-soft-power-at-the-service-of-a-rising-powers-political-ambitions
Batuman, E. (2014, February 17). Ottomania. The New Yorker. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/02/17/ottomania
Dehghan, S. K. (2011, April 18). Tehran supports the Arab spring ... but not in Syria. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/apr/18/iran-arab-spring-syria-uprisings
Interdisciplinary Studies in Media and Culture
Volume 15, Issue 2 - Serial Number 30
Autumn and Winter 2025-2026
March 2026
Pages 217-245

  • Receive Date 24 April 2025
  • Revise Date 18 May 2025
  • Accept Date 20 May 2025
  • Publish Date 20 February 2026

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us